WW2 British Tanks, Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2 - a Churchill tank in march
WW2 British Tanks, Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2 - a Churchill tank in march

WW2 British Tanks: Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2

27 mins read

This post is also available in: Magyar (Hungarian) Deutsch (German) language

Key Notes for WW2 British Tanks – Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2

  • Development Phases: British tank development evolved significantly during WWII, marked by early designs like the Matilda II and progressing to more advanced models such as the Cromwell and Comet.
  • Tank Types: Diverse tank categories including light tanks, infantry tanks, and cruiser tanks catered to different tactical needs in the war.
  • Technological Innovations: British tanks saw advancements in armor, firepower, and mobility, reflecting the changing demands of modern warfare.
  • Key Battles: British tanks were pivotal in various campaigns, including the North African Campaign and the Normandy Invasion.
  • Comparative Analysis: British tanks, while not always matching the firepower and armor of German models, offered greater operational flexibility.
WW2 British Tanks, Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2 - a Churchill tank in march
WW2 British Tanks, Armored Battle Tanks of World War 2 – a Churchill tank in march

Introduction- Overview of British Tank Development during WWII

Pre-WWII Foundations and Initial Challenges

British tanks originated from the need to break the stalemate of trench warfare in WWI, but post-war, the Army’s focus shifted away from tanks. Economic constraints and conservative military doctrine hindered the development of armoured forces. Despite pioneering tank warfare in WWI, by WWII, British tank development was lagging due to limited resources and unclear military doctrine​​.

Early WWII Tank Design Philosophy

British tank design in the early stages of WWII was dictated by the desire to fulfill varying tactical needs: light tanks for reconnaissance, heavily armored infantry tanks for frontal assaults, and faster cruiser tanks for breakthroughs and engaging enemy tanks. The division between these tank types led to design challenges, impacting the effectiveness of British tanks.

Impact of War Experience on Tank Development:

The French campaign in 1940 exposed the deficiencies of British tanks. They lacked the armor to withstand German anti-tank guns, and their armament was not powerful enough. This led to a realization of the need for better armor and firepower in British tanks. However, external constraints, such as the need for tanks to be transportable by railway and overseas, limited the potential for upgradation​​.

Shift in Tank Production Strategy

Post-1940, there was a shift in British tank production strategy. Initially, the focus was on mass production of existing designs, even if they were flawed. This led to the continued production of outdated or inadequate tanks like the Covenanter and Crusader. It wasn’t until later in the war that newer, more effective designs like the Cromwell and Comet were prioritized​​.

Development of the Infantry Tank and North African Campaign

The North African campaign was a crucial testing ground for British tanks. Infantry tanks like the Matilda II initially performed well but were soon outclassed by German anti-tank guns. The cruiser tanks faced similar issues, struggling against more advanced German tanks. These challenges underscored the need for more robust and effective British tank designs​​.

Introduction of New Tank Models and the Shift to Cruiser Tanks

During the early years of the war, infantry tanks like the Valentine and Churchill were introduced. The Valentine was notable for its reliability, and the Churchill, despite initial issues, became a staple of British armored forces. Later, the focus shifted to developing more effective cruiser tanks, leading to the development of models like the Cromwell and the Comet​​.

Late War Developments and Comparative Analysis

By 1944, British tank development had improved significantly. The Cromwell and Comet tanks, though late to the war, provided better performance. However, they still struggled against superior German tanks like the Tiger and Panther. It was recognized that British tanks, although not matching the firepower and armor of some German models, offered greater operational flexibility due to their reliability and mobility​​.

Legacy and Concluding Reflections

The story of British tank development during WWII highlights the challenges of balancing armor, firepower, and mobility. The late introduction of more effective models like the Comet showed potential, but it was a case of too little, too late. The British experience contrasted with the Soviet T-34, which exemplified the effective balance that British tanks struggled to achieve throughout the war​​.

In summary, British tank development during WWII evolved from a series of early missteps and inadequate designs to the eventual production of more capable models. This journey was marked by strategic shifts in response to battlefield experiences, technical and logistical constraints, and the evolving nature of armored warfare.

The Role of British Tanks and Armored Vehicles in the War Effort

British Tank Production and Development

During World War II, the British produced a significant number of tanks and armored vehicles, reflecting the evolving requirements of tank warfare. The total production from July 1939 to May 1945 included 27,528 tanks and self-propelled guns. Notable among these were the Infantry Tank Mk II Matilda II, with 2,987 units produced from 1937 to 1943; the Infantry Tank Mk III Valentine, totaling 8,275 units from 1939 to 1945; and the Infantry Tank Mk IV Churchill, with 5,768 units from 1941 to 1945. The Light Tank Mk VI saw a production of 1,682 units between 1936 and 1940, while the Light Tank Mk VII Tetrarch had a smaller production of 177 units. Among Cruiser Tanks, the Mk I (A9) had 125 units, Mk II (A10) had 175 units, Mk III (A13) had 65 units, Mk VI Crusader had 5,300 units, Mk VII Cavalier had 500 units, Mk VIII Centaur had 950 units, Mk VIII Cromwell had 3,066 units, Mk VIII Challenger had 200 units, and the Comet I (A34) had 1,186 units. The Centurion I (A41) was also developed, with a total production of only 6 units​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​.

Key Battles Involving British Tanks

One of the most significant engagements was Operation Goodwood in Normandy, France, in July 1944. Termed by some historians as the largest tank battle in the British Army’s history, British forces deployed two infantry divisions and three armored divisions with 1,100 tanks. The objective was to take control of Caen to break through German lines. The British advanced seven miles but faced stiff resistance, resulting in 3,474 casualties and the loss of 314 tanks​​.

British Tank Losses in WWII

Throughout the war, the UK lost a total of 15,844 tanks and 1,957 armored cars. This number reflects the intensity and scale of tank warfare during this period​​.

Evolution of British Tank Strategy and Design

At the start of WWII, most British tanks were equipped with the Ordnance QF 2-pounder gun, capable of penetrating German armor. However, as the war progressed, there was a shift towards bigger guns and thicker armor, leading to heavier tanks. This was a response to the evolving battlefield requirements and the need to counter German Blitzkrieg tactics, which emphasized speed and firepower. British tank design and strategy evolved significantly during the war. The infantry tank concept, heavily armored and slower, was developed to support infantry advances. However, these tanks were often too slow, and cruiser tanks, meant for rapid movement, were vulnerable and mechanically unreliable. This led to a convergence in the design of infantry and cruiser tanks towards the war’s end. The armament of British tanks also evolved, with the development of more powerful guns like the 17-pounder, which proved effective against the formidable German Tiger and Panther tanks​​.

Vickers Infantry Tank before the war<a href="Vickers Infantry Tank before the war" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
Vickers Infantry Tank before the war Source

Pre-War British Battle Tank Development – The Vickers Medium Infantry Tank

Early Experiments and Influences (1919-1920s)

Following World War I, the British Army, recognizing the tank’s potential from trench warfare experiences, began exploring armored vehicle designs. Key advancements were made in suspensions, tracks, communications, and battlefield organization. The Vickers-Armstrong company emerged as a significant contributor, influencing international tank design. Notable was the Vickers 6-Ton, which, despite not being adopted by the British Army, became a blueprint for various foreign tanks​​​​.

Development of Tank Variants (Late 1920s-1930s)

By the late 1920s, British tank development had crystallized into three main categories: light, cruiser, and infantry tanks. Infantry tanks, heavily armored to support foot soldiers, had a maximum speed matching a rifleman’s pace. In contrast, cruiser tanks, fulfilling traditional cavalry roles, were designed for speed and were lightly armored with anti-tank armament. Light tanks focused on reconnaissance and colonial duties, emphasizing cost-effectiveness. This period also saw the formation of the Experimental Mechanised Force, a brigade-sized unit for field-testing tank usage and radio control in warfare​​​​.

Technological Innovations and Designs

The British tank development featured several innovative designs. The Vickers Medium Mk II combined characteristics of World War I tanks into a faster design, including a fully rotating turret with a dual-purpose gun. The Medium Mark III, developed later, was noted for its reliable gun platform, although it suffered from suspension issues. These designs highlighted the evolving focus on mobility and firepower in tank design​​​​.

Doctrine and Strategy Shifts

During this period, British military doctrine began to shift, recognizing the broader potential of mechanized forces beyond mere infantry support. Figures like Colonel J.F.C. Fuller and others in the Royal Tank Corps envisioned roles for tanks in mass armored offensives, influencing future military strategies. This doctrinal evolution led to a diversification in tank roles and capabilities, laying the groundwork for their extensive use in World War II​​.

Key British Tanks of World War II – Heavy Tanks, Medium Tanks and Light Tanks of Royal Tank Regiments

Matilda tank in North Africa<a href="https://www.militaryimages.net/media/matilda-tank-north-africa-ww2.122313/full?d=1521523210" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
Matilda tank in North Africa Source

Matilda II: The Queen of the Desert

The Matilda II, officially known as the Infantry Tank Mark II, was a pivotal British tank during WW2. It began as the A12 specification in 1936, evolving from the machine gun-armed A11 Infantry Tank Mark I. The Matilda II, with its heavy armor, was primarily designed for infantry support, though it had limited speed and armament. Renowned for its service from the start of the war to its end, it was particularly associated with the North Africa Campaign.

Manufactured between 1937 and 1943, a total of 2,987 Matilda IIs were built. The peak production year was 1942, with the most common model being the Mark IV​​. The tank’s mass was 25 tons, and it measured 18 ft 5 in in length, 8 ft 6 in in width, and 8 ft 3 in in height. It was operated by a crew of four: a driver, gunner, loader, and a tank commander​.

The Matilda II’s armor was notably robust, with the front glacis up to 78 mm thick. Its heavy armor, heavier than its contemporaries like the German Panzer III and Panzer IV, earned it the nickname “Queen of the Desert” during 1940-1941​​. The tank was armed with a QF-2 pounder (40 mm) gun and a secondary 7.92 mm Besa machine gun​​.

In combat, the Matilda II first saw action with the 7th Royal Tank Regiment in France in 1940. Despite its effective armor, its 2-pounder gun was comparable to other 37 to 45 mm range tank guns of the era. The tank was largely immune to the guns of German tanks and anti-tank guns in France, but the German 88 mm anti-aircraft guns proved to be an effective counter-measure​​.

During the war in North Africa, the Matilda II was effective against Italian and German tanks but was vulnerable to larger calibre and medium calibre anti-tank guns. Its low speed and unreliable steering mechanism were significant drawbacks in the open desert. However, during Operation Crusader, Matilda tanks were instrumental in the break-out from Tobruk and the capture of the Axis fortress of Bardia​​​​.

A total of 409 Matilda IIs were supplied to the Australian army between 1942 and 1944, and they remained in service with the Australian Citizen Military Forces until about 1955​​​​.

Technical Specifications Table:

TypeInfantry Tank Mark II
Production Years1937–1943
Number Built2,987
Weight25 tons
Length18 ft 5 in
Width8 ft 6 in
Height8 ft 3 in
Crew4 (driver, gunner, loader, commander)
Armor Thickness20 to 78 mm
Main ArmamentQF-2 pounder (40 mm) gun
Secondary Armament7.92 mm Besa machine gun
Engine2× diesel 6-cylinder 7-litre engines
Power190 bhp Leyland engine
Transmission6 speed Wilson epicyclic pre-selector gearbox
SuspensionCoil spring
Fuel Capacity181.8 litres internal + 163.3 litres auxiliary tank
Operational Range80 km with internal + 157 km with auxiliary tank
Maximum Speed15 mph on road
British Crusader Tank in the North African desert during World War 2<a href="https://live.staticflickr.com/3732/9184541245_27978990ab_z.jpg" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
British Crusader Tank in the North African desert during World War 2 Source

Crusader: Speed and Agility in Combat

The Crusader, officially designated as the “Tank, Cruiser, Mk VI, Crusader,” was a cornerstone in the British tank arsenal during the early stages of World War II. As a cruiser tank, it was integral to the British Army’s successes, especially in the North African campaign.

  • Development: The Crusader’s inception began with Nuffield’s A16 design for a heavy cruiser tank using Christie suspension. However, a demand for a lighter, more cost-effective tank led to the creation of the A13 Mk III cruiser tank, known as “Covenanter.” Nuffield, preferring to develop its own model, evolved the A13 into the Crusader, under the General Staff specification A15. The design was ordered “off the drawing board,” bypassing prototype stages, with the Crusader pilot model ready six weeks before the Covenanter​​.
  • Manufacturing and Deployment: Over 5,300 Crusaders were produced between 1940 and 1943 by Nuffield Mechanizations and Aero Ltd. The first Crusader Mark I tanks entered service in 1941, followed by the improved Mark II and III variants. The Crusader III was especially notable for its matchup against mid-generation German tanks like the Panzer III and IV during critical battles like the Second Battle of El Alamein, the siege of Tobruk, and the Tunisia campaign. However, by late 1942, the Crusader was eclipsed by the US-supplied M3 Grant and M4 Sherman tanks due to armament limitations and reliability issues in the desert​​.
  • Design and Specifications:
    • Armour: Varied across models, with the Mark I having 40 mm, Mark II 49 mm, and Mark III 51 mm armor.
    • Armament: Initially equipped with a 40 mm Ordnance QF 2-pounder gun, the Mark III was upgraded to a 57 mm Ordnance QF 6-pounder, enhancing its combat effectiveness.
    • Engine: Powered by a 27-litre V-12 petrol Nuffield Liberty engine, producing 340 bhp at 1,500 rpm.
    • Speed and Range: Achieved a maximum speed of 26 mph on roads, with an operational range of 141 miles using auxiliary tanks.
    • Suspension: Utilized the Christie helical spring suspension for improved mobility​​.
  • Challenges and Modifications: Despite initial advantages over comparable Stuart light tanks, the Crusader faced chronic reliability problems in the desert. Issues included inadequate tools and manuals, a shortage of spare parts, and design flaws like compromised cooling systems. Modifications over time improved its reliability, but its reputation suffered. The tank’s lighter armor and absence of high-explosive shell ammunition for its main armament were tactical limitations in combat against Axis forces​​.
  • Later Role and Legacy: Post the North African Campaign, the emergence of more advanced tanks like the Sherman and Cromwell relegated the Crusader to secondary roles like anti-aircraft mounts and gun tractors. However, its influence extended beyond WW2, with its design elements contributing to subsequent British tank development. Notably, the Crusader’s turret was used by the French Far East Expeditionary Corps during the first Indochina War​​.

Table of Crusader Tank Specifications:

TypeCruiser Tank
In Service1941–1949
Number Built5,300
Crew3 (Mk III), 4 or 5 (Mk I, II)
Length20 ft 8.5 in
Width9 ft 1 in
Height7 ft 4 in
Mass18.8 to 19.7 long tons
Main Armament40 mm (Mk I, II), 57 mm (Mk III)
Secondary Armament1 or 2 × Besa machine guns
EngineNuffield Liberty V-12 petrol engine
Power340 bhp
Speed (Road)26 mph
Speed (Off-road)15 mph
Operational Range141 mi (with auxiliary tanks)
Armour40-51 mm (varied across models)
Churchills, Mk VII variant in 1944 or 1945 on a muddy road in WW2<a href="https://www.worldwarphotos.info/wp-content/gallery/uk/british-tanks/churchill-a22/Churchills_VII_44-45.jpg" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
Churchills, Mk VII variant in 1944 or 1945 on a muddy road in WW2 Source

Churchill Heavy Tank: The Armored Workhorse

The Churchill tank, a key British infantry tank of the Second World War, was a formidable example of British tank development. This armored vehicle, named after the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, was a product of the collaboration between Harland & Wolff and Vauxhall Motors, entering service in 1941 and remaining active until 1952. About 5,640 Churchill tanks were produced, each weighing between 39.1 and 40.7 tons depending on the model​​.

The Churchill tank was significant for its heavy armor and large longitudinal chassis with all-around tracks. Its armor thickness varied across models: Churchill I–VI featured 102 mm on the hull front, 76 mm on the sides, and 89 mm on the turret front, while Mark VII–VIII boasted even thicker armor, up to 152 mm on the front​​. The tank’s main armament evolved from the QF 2 pounder to the QF 6 pounder, and eventually to the QF 75mm and QF 95mm guns, catering to the increasing demands of warfare​​.

Churchill’s operational capacity was marked by its 12-cylinder, 350 hp engine, and a Merritt-Brown 4-speed gearbox, providing a maximum speed of 15 mph. Its operational range was between 75 and 130 miles, depending on the conditions​​. The tank’s design incorporated flat plates for the hull, initially bolted and later welded in subsequent models. Its unique suspension system featured eleven bogies on each side, with each carrying two 10-inch wheels, allowing it to traverse rough terrain and sustain multiple hits without significant impairment​​.

Despite its strengths, the Churchill faced challenges, such as its underpowered engine and initial inadequate armament. These issues were gradually addressed through design modifications and upgrades in armament​​. The Churchill tanks saw service in various fronts including the North African, Italian, and North-West Europe campaigns, and were also sent to the Soviet Union as military aid, with over 250 units seeing active service on the Eastern Front​​.

Throughout the war, the Churchill tank underwent numerous modifications, notably being up-gunned from a 2-pounder to a 6-pounder, and then to a 75 mm gun. The Mark VII, introduced in 1944, was a significant upgrade with enhanced armor and armament, making it one of the most heavily armored tanks of the war​​. Production of the various Churchill models varied over the years, with the Churchill VII being the most produced model at 1,400 units​​.

Technical Specifications Table:

TypeInfantry Tank, Heavy tank
Production Years1941-1945
Number BuiltApprox. 5,640
Weight39.1 to 40.7 tons
Length24 ft 5 in (7.44 m)
Width10 ft 8 in (3.25 m)
Height8 ft 2 in (2.49 m)
Crew5 (Commander, Gunner, Loader/Radio Operator, Driver, Co-driver/Hull Gunner)
Armor16 mm to 152 mm
Main ArmamentQF 2 pounder to QF 75mm/95mm
Secondary Armament7.92mm Besa MG, 3 inch Howitzer (Mark I)
EngineBedford 12-cylinder petrol engine, 350 hp
Operational Range75-130 miles
Maximum Speed15 mph
SuspensionCoiled spring
Steering SystemTriple differential in gearbox
British Cromwell tank on a road, commander is out<a href="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53322677341_2904651753_b.jpg" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
British Cromwell tank on a road, commander is out Source

Cromwell: A New Era of Mobility

The Cromwell tank, officially known as Tank, Cruiser, Mk VIII, Cromwell (A27M), marked a significant shift in British tank design during World War II. This cruiser tank was the first to integrate a potent combination of high speed and reasonable armor, thanks to its Rolls-Royce Meteor engine. Although initially intended to be equipped with a high-velocity gun, it was fitted with a medium-velocity dual-purpose gun due to size constraints in the turret. This limitation led to the development of the Comet tank.

The Cromwell saw its first action in the Battle of Normandy in June 1944. Primarily used by the Royal Armoured Corps in the 7th, 11th, and Guards Armoured Divisions, it played a crucial role in reconnaissance. Notably, the 7th Armoured Division was fully equipped with Cromwells, while the other divisions used a mix of Cromwells and M4 Shermans. Its design originated in 1940 as a replacement for the Crusader tank. Nuffield’s A24, heavily based on the Crusader and powered by an outdated Liberty engine, was initially chosen. However, the design evolved significantly over time.

A breakthrough in its development was the integration of the Rolls-Royce Meteor engine, derived from the Merlin engine used in aircraft. This upgrade provided the tank with exceptional mobility, a characteristic that was further enhanced by the improved Christie suspension system. The tank’s design was eventually split into three separate vehicles, with the A27M Cromwell being the final and most advanced iteration.

The Cromwell was armed with the Ordnance QF 75 mm gun and two 7.92 mm Besa machine guns, and it had a crew of five. The tank was 20 ft 10 in long, 9 ft 6+1⁄2 in wide, and 8 ft 2 in tall, with a mass of 27.6 long tons. Its armor thickness varied, with 64 mm on the hull front and 76.7 mm on the turret front. The tank could reach speeds of up to 40 mph, with an operational range of 170 miles on roads and 80 miles cross-country.

In total, 4,016 A27 tanks were produced, comprising 950 Centaurs and 3,066 Cromwells. Production was led by Leyland Motors and the Birmingham Railway Carriage and Wagon Company, with several other British firms contributing due to the high demand​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​.

Table: Cromwell Tank Specifications

Mass27.6 long tons (28.0 t)
DimensionsLength: 20 ft 10 in, Width: 9 ft 6+1⁄2 in, Height: 8 ft 2 in
Crew5 (Commander, gunner, loader/radio operator, driver, hull gunner)
ArmourHull: 64 mm, Turret: 76.7 mm
Main ArmamentOrdnance QF 75 mm gun (64 rounds)
Secondary Armament2 x 7.92 mm Besa machine guns (4,950 rounds)
EngineRolls-Royce Meteor V12 petrol (600 hp)
Power/Weight21.4 hp/tonne
SuspensionImproved Christie
Fuel Capacity110 + 30 imp gal (optional auxiliary)
Operational Range170 miles (roads), 80 miles (cross-country)
Speed40 mph (max), 25 mph (roads), 18 mph (cross-country)
British Comet tank in a destroyed city, WWII<a href="https://www.militaryimages.net/media/british-comet-tank.31099/full?d=1521495674" rel="nofollow"> Source</a>
British Comet tank in a destroyed city, WWII Source

Comet: Paving the Way for Post-War Tank Design

The British Comet tank, officially known as the Tank, Cruiser, Comet I (A34), marked a significant advancement in British tank design during the Second World War. Developed from the Cromwell tank, the Comet incorporated numerous improvements, most notably the 17 pdr High Velocity (HV) gun, a potent weapon against the German tanks like the Panther and Tiger. This 77 mm gun, with its superior armor-penetrating capabilities, especially when firing APDS rounds, rendered the Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger obsolete and laid the groundwork for the development of the Centurion tank​​.

Design and Development: The need for a new heavy cruiser tank became apparent after combat experiences in the Western Desert Campaign against German tanks. The design process, which began in 1943, aimed to address the shortcomings of the Cruiser tanks like the Crusader, Cavalier, and Centaur. The Comet was designed to correct some of the Cromwell’s flaws in armament, track design, and suspension while leveraging its strengths in speed and mobility​​.

Production and Deployment: Comet tanks were built by several British firms, including Leyland, English Electric, John Fowler & Co., and Metro-Cammell. A total of 1,200 Comets were produced, with the first units entering service in January 1945. They remained in British service until 1958 and saw use in various fronts, including the Western Allied invasion of Germany. The 11th Armoured Division was the first to be completely refitted with Comets by the end of the war​​.

Technical Specifications:

  • Armor: The Comet’s hull armor ranged from 32 mm to 74 mm, while the turret armor varied from 57 mm to 102 mm.
  • Weaponry: The main armament was the 77 mm HV gun, capable of firing various armor-piercing rounds, including the APCBC and APDS, with a muzzle velocity of 3400 fps (1036 m/s). Additionally, the Comet was equipped with two BESA 7.92 mm machine guns and a 2-inch bomb thrower.
  • Speed: Top speed was limited to 32 mph (51 km/h), a reduction from the Cromwell’s speed to extend the lifespan of the suspension and engine components.
  • Suspension: The Christie suspension system was used, providing a fast and smooth ride but occupying valuable internal space.
  • Crew: The crew included positions for the driver, co-driver/hull machine gunner, and turret crew, with enhanced communication capabilities through the installation of Wireless Set No. 19 and No. 38 Wireless.
  • Versions: Two main versions of the Comet were produced, Type A and Type B, with Type B introduced post-war featuring various modifications including ‘fishtail’ exhausts and smoke dischargers on the turret​​​​.

Summary Table:

Armor ThicknessHull: 32-74 mm, Turret: 57-102 mm
Main Weapon77 mm HV gun
Secondary WeaponryTwo 7.92 mm BESA machine guns, 2-inch bomb thrower
Speed32 mph (51 km/h)
SuspensionChristie suspension system
Crew CommunicationWireless Set No. 19, No. 38 Wireless
Production Numbers1,200 units
Service Duration1945-1958
VersionsType A and Type B

In conclusion, the Comet tank represented a significant evolution in British tank development during WW2, addressing the need for a powerful, yet mobile, armored vehicle capable of countering the advanced German tanks. Its design influenced post-war tank development, particularly in the transition to the Centurion, and its performance in the latter stages of the war demonstrated the effectiveness of these innovations.

Other Notable Models of WW2 British Tanks – Cruiser Tank, A20 and Cromwell

During World War II, British tank development focused on various models beyond the well-known Comet, Cromwell, Churchill, Crusader, and Matilda tanks. These lesser-known models played pivotal roles throughout the war, showcasing the evolution of British tank design and production.

A-13 Cruiser Tank: The A-13 was a British cruiser tank produced prior to and during the Second World War. It marked a significant development in British armored vehicle design, being the first cruiser tank based on the Christie suspension design. This specification led to three different vehicles: the A13 Mark I (Cruiser Mk III), A13 Mark II (Cruiser Mk IV), and A13 Mark III (Covenanter tank)​​.

A20 Heavy Tank: Designed by Harland and Wolff, the A20 was an infantry tank intended to replace the Matilda II and Valentine tanks. It was conceptualized with the expectation of trench warfare conditions akin to the First World War. Despite the production of two pilot models, A20E1 and A20E2, the changing nature of warfare in the Second World War led to the shift towards the A22 specification, which would later become the famous Churchill tank​​.

Black Prince (A43): The Black Prince was an experimental development of the Churchill tank, featuring a larger, wider hull and equipped with a powerful QF 17-pounder gun. It represented a continuation of the British infantry tanks, designed for close support of infantry and integration with other tanks. However, its heavy weight and the retention of the Churchill’s 350-horsepower engine made it underpowered and slow, limiting its tactical utility. By the time the Black Prince prototypes appeared in 1945, it had become redundant due to the emergence of more advanced tanks like the Sherman Firefly and Comet​​.

Cavalier Tank (A24): The Cavalier tank was an interim cruiser tank design derived from Nuffield’s Crusader tank. It was intended as a follow-on to enter production in 1942. However, it was ultimately overshadowed by the Cromwell and Centaur tanks, which were accepted for service in preference to the Cavalier. Built with an uprated 410 hp Liberty engine and armored with 63 to 70 mm at the front, Cavaliers were primarily used in training or auxiliary armored vehicle roles​​​​.

Cromwell Tank (A27M): The Cromwell tank was a major cruiser tank of the British Army in WW2. It combined high speed from the powerful Rolls-Royce Meteor engine with reasonable armor. The development of the Cromwell was complex, involving various specifications and designs, including the A24 Cavalier and A27L Centaur. The Cromwell’s design and production were influenced by previous models like the Crusader tank and the changing requirements of armored warfare​​.

Technological Advances and Design Philosophy of British Tanks in WW2

The evolution of British tanks during the Second World War reflects a period of rapid technological advancement and a significant shift in design philosophy, driven by the exigencies of war and the lessons learned on the battlefield.

Armour and Armament: Evolution through Necessity

At the outbreak of WW2, British tank units were equipped with a variety of models, including light tanks designed by Vickers, known for their speed but limited to heavy machine guns for armament. These early tanks, including the series of cruiser tanks, suffered from mechanical unreliability. However, models like the Cromwell, Comet, and Centurion, developed later in the war, marked significant improvements in reliability and performance​​.

Initially, British tanks, such as the Mark VI light tanks and the Matilda II, were ill-prepared against the more advanced German tanks. The Matilda II stood out for its robust armor, capable of resisting the powerful guns of German tanks, which proved crucial in operations like the counterattack near Arras in May 1940​​.

British tank design at the start of WW2 featured the Ordnance QF 2-pounder (40mm) gun, effective against contemporary German armor. However, as the war progressed, a trend towards larger guns and thicker armor emerged, leading to heavier tank designs. The evolution of armament in British tanks was marked by phases, from the Matilda I with a single machine gun to the introduction of the 6-pounder (57mm) and the development of the 17-pounder (76.2 mm), which became the best British gun of the war​​.

Mobility and Speed: Responding to Battlefield Demands

The British Army faced significant challenges in adapting their tank designs to the new realities of armored warfare. Their experiences across various theaters of war, from the deserts of North Africa to the mountains of Italy, highlighted the importance of mobility and speed in tank design​​.

In North Africa, British armoured forces initially relied on older designs like the Mk VI light tank and the Matilda II. However, the arrival of the German Afrika Korps, with more advanced tanks and anti-tank guns, exposed the limitations of these models. The A13 Crusader, despite its flaws, became a staple of British tank warfare in North Africa due to its mobility and number, playing a significant role in operations like Operation Crusader in 1941​​.

The design of cruiser tanks, which prioritized mobility over armor, evolved throughout the war. The Cromwell cruiser tank, introduced in 1944, marked a significant improvement in British cruiser design with its high mobility, reasonable armor, and reliable 75mm cannon​​.

Communication and Crew Comfort: Overlooked Aspects

The British tank doctrine and design philosophy underwent significant shifts during WW2, partly influenced by military theorists like J.F.C Fuller and Basil Liddell-Hart, who advocated for tanks as the main driving force in attacks. This shift required not only changes in armor and armament but also in aspects like communication and crew comfort, often overlooked but crucial for effective operations​​.

The initial experiences of British tank crews, especially in the early stages of the war, were challenging due to the limitations in design, armament, and comfort within the tanks. These experiences led to improvements in internal ergonomics and communication systems, vital for coordinating movements and strategies in the complex battlefield scenarios of WW2​​.

In summary, British tanks in World War Two underwent a transformative journey, evolving from a technologically backward force at the war’s outset to a more innovative and effective arm of the British Army by the war’s end. This evolution was marked by significant advancements in armor, armament, mobility, and design philosophy, adapting to the changing demands of modern warfare and laying the groundwork for future tank designs​​.

British Tanks and Tank Destroyers in Key Battles of the Second World War

The Battle of France: Early Lessons

The British Expeditionary Force (BEF), formed in 1938 and deployed in France in 1939, played a crucial role in the early stage of World War II. Although numerically inferior to Allied forces, the BEF was highly mechanized, comprising infantry, artillery, and a significant number of tanks, including cavalry tanks (Cruisers), Scouts (Light), and Infantry tanks​​. During the Battle of France, British tanks, particularly the Matilda, demonstrated resilience against the German onslaught at Amiens. However, they were ultimately outmatched by German firepower and air superiority, leading to significant losses of British armored vehicles on the way to Dunkirk​​.

North Africa: Matilda and Crusader in Action

The North African Campaign, from 1940 to 1943, was pivotal in British tank development and deployment. Initially, the British armored force was composed of older tank models, including Light Tanks Mk.II/III and the obsolete Vickers Medium Mark II. However, as the campaign progressed, British tank production focused on models like the Matilda II, Cruiser tank Mk.IV, and the newly introduced Valentine​​. The Crusader tank, with its Christie suspension, provided exceptional performance on the flat terrains of North Africa. Additionally, the British forces were bolstered by American tanks like the M3 (known as Lee in US service and Grant in British service), which were crucial in halting the German advance at El Alamein​​.

Eastern Front: Lend-Lease Contributions

British contributions to the Eastern Front came predominantly through the Lend-Lease program, where they provided tanks and other armored vehicles to the Soviet Union. This support played a significant role in enhancing the Red Army’s capabilities, especially with tanks like the Valentine, which was used effectively as a light tank in the Soviet forces.

Normandy and Beyond: The Role of Cromwell and Comet

During the D-Day and subsequent European campaigns of 1944-45, the British armored forces primarily consisted of US-built Sherman tanks and the British Cromwell. The Sherman Firefly, an up-gunned version of the Sherman, was particularly effective in engaging German armor​​. The Cromwell tank, known for its speed and equipped with a QF 6-Pdr gun, was vital in training and equipping elite armored units​​. The Comet tank, introduced in early 1945, embodied the culmination of British tank development, combining speed, armor, and firepower, and was a precursor to the post-war main battle tank concept​​.

Throughout World War II, British tanks evolved significantly, reflecting the lessons learned in various theaters of war. From the early engagements in France to the final battles in Europe, British tanks transitioned from basic designs to more sophisticated and effective armored vehicles. This evolution was marked by continuous innovation, adaptations to enemy tactics and terrain, and contributions from allied nations, particularly the United States. The British armored forces, though initially outmatched in some areas, adapted and overcame challenges, ultimately playing a pivotal role in the Allied victory in World War II.

Comparative Analysis of British Tanks of World War 2

British vs German Tank Design

The British and German approaches to tank design during World War II were notably different, with the British struggling to produce a competitive design. Early in the war, British tanks like the Vickers Mediums were inadequate, featuring outdated design elements like box-like structures and weak armaments. Efforts to improve designs led to the introduction of specialized tanks: light tanks for reconnaissance, infantry tanks for frontal assaults, and cruisers for breakthroughs and tank combat. However, this approach complicated British tank development and production​​.

German tanks, on the other hand, were generally superior in design and effectiveness. The Panzerkampfwagen series, including the Panzer Mark IV, V (Panther), and VI (Tiger), were renowned for their firepower, armor, and mechanical design. The Panther and Tiger – especially with well trained Panzer Aces – dominant in tank warfare. German tanks’ use of diesel fuel also contributed to their crews’ survivability compared to the gasoline-powered tanks of the Allies​​.

Collaboration with American Tank Production

The British army’s reliance on American tanks, especially the Sherman, was a significant aspect of its armored force strategy. The Sherman, despite its vulnerabilities such as being prone to catch fire and being outgunned by German tanks, was highly valued for its availability. Over 25,600 Shermans were received from America, supplementing the British tank force. The Sherman’s adaptability led to modifications like the Firefly, which was upgraded with a more powerful gun. This collaboration underscores the British army’s challenges in producing a sufficiently effective tank of their own during the war​​.

British Tanks vs Soviet Armored Vehicles

Comparing British tanks with Soviet armored vehicles reveals distinct developmental paths. The Soviet Union, drawing on its industrial growth and experiences from the Russian Civil War, aggressively expanded its armored forces. Soviet tank design was heavily influenced by earlier British and American models, but quickly evolved into more innovative designs like the T-34. This tank achieved a balance of firepower, armor, and mobility that the British designs struggled to match. Soviet tanks, particularly the T-34, were instrumental in setting new standards in tank warfare, influencing even German tank development. The Soviet approach to armored warfare was characterized by a combination of mass production and innovation, leading to a vast and diverse tank fleet​​.

In summary, British tank development during World War II was hampered by initial underinvestment, doctrinal indecision, and technical challenges, leading to reliance on American designs like the Sherman. In contrast, German tanks were marked by superior design and effectiveness, while Soviet armored vehicles showcased rapid innovation and mass production capabilities. This comparative analysis highlights the varied approaches and challenges faced by these nations in tank development and production during the war.

WW2 British Tanks in Popular Culture and Memory

British Tanks in Film and Television

World War II has been a prolific source of inspiration for films and television, with a significant focus on the Allied perspective. British tanks and armored vehicles, key components of the British Army’s arsenal, have featured prominently in this narrative. Iconic films such as “The Longest Day,” “The Great Escape,” and “Battle of Britain” have highlighted the role of British tanks in the conflict. The portrayal of these tanks has often emphasized their strategic importance in pivotal battles, such as those in North Africa, and their technological evolution throughout the war. From the early, less effective models like the Light Tank Mk to the more advanced Churchill and Matilda II tanks, these vehicles have been depicted in various stages of tank development and warfare. The film industry has continued to produce World War II-themed films into the 21st century, maintaining the visibility of British tanks in popular culture​​.

British Tanks in Museums and Exhibitions

The Tank Museum in Dorset, England, stands as a testament to the historical significance of British tanks. Housing the world’s largest collection of tanks, the museum showcases nearly 300 armored vehicles from 26 countries, including notable British models like the Tiger 131 and the Mark I tank. This museum not only preserves the physical remnants of British tank history but also educates the public through its YouTube channel. This digital outreach has surpassed even renowned institutions like the Metropolitan Museum of Art in subscriber count, indicating a widespread interest in armored warfare history. In 2023, the museum launched the “Tanks for the Memories: The Tank in Popular Culture” exhibition to commemorate its 100th anniversary. This exhibit explores the tank’s cultural iconography through various mediums, including toys, games, models, art, books, comics, video games, and films, further underscoring the tank’s impact on popular culture​​​​.

British Tanks in Commemoration and Celebration

British tanks from World War II have also found a place in national remembrance and celebration. This is evident in various war cemeteries and memorials that honor the tank crews and their contributions during the war. Celebratory events and reenactments often feature these tanks, showcasing their designs, from infantry tanks to cruiser and heavy tanks, and highlighting their roles in key battles. These commemorations not only pay tribute to the military achievements of the British Army but also serve as educational tools, providing insights into tank design and production, the evolution of British armored vehicles throughout the war, and the broader context of tank warfare in World War II.

In summary, the legacy of British tanks in World War II has been immortalized in popular culture and memory through their portrayal in media, preservation in museums, and commemoration in public celebrations. These tanks, from the early Vickers Light Tanks to the formidable Churchill and Matilda II, represent a significant chapter in military history and continue to captivate audiences with their stories of resilience and innovation.

FAQ – British tanks in World War 2

What were the main types of British tanks in WWII?

British tanks were categorized into light tanks, infantry tanks, and cruiser tanks, each designed for specific roles.

How did British tank design evolve during the war?

British tank design evolved from early models with limited armament and armor to more advanced designs with improved firepower and mobility.

What were some notable British tanks of WWII?

Notable models include the Matilda II, Valentine, Churchill, Cromwell, and Comet tanks.

What role did British tanks play in the North African Campaign?

British tanks, like the Matilda II and Crusader, were crucial in operations against Italian and German forces in North Africa.

How did British tanks compare to German tanks?

While British tanks were often outmatched in firepower and armor, they excelled in reliability and operational flexibility.

Did British tanks undergo any significant modifications during the war?

Yes, British tanks underwent modifications in armament, armor, and internal systems to enhance performance and crew comfort.

What impact did American tanks have on British armored forces?

American tanks, particularly the Sherman, supplemented British armored forces, with some models like the Firefly being significantly modified for increased firepower.

How did British tank design influence post-war tank development?

British tank design, especially the later models like the Comet, influenced post-war designs, laying the groundwork for future tanks like the Centurion.


Commander, a passionate writer and historian, delves into the captivating world of tanks in World War II, uncovering their stories and honoring their indomitable spirit.
LinkedIn Twitter Tumblr

Elefant tank destroyer - Sdkfz 184 - Panzerjäger Tiger P heavy tank destroyer

Elefant Tank Destroyer

Jagdpanzer 38t SdKfz 138 2 Hetzer german tank destroyer of World War 2 Source

Hetzer or Jagdpanzer 38

The Best Tank of WW2 - Deep Analysis of Top Tanks of World War II - Detailed Look into the Tiger Heavy Tank  Source

Best Tank of WW2

Nashorn Tank Destroyer SdKfz 164 Hornisse with 8.8 cm PAK

Hornisse Tank Destroyer: SdKfz 164 Nashorn

Alfred Großrock, top Panther ace of Germany in World War 2 on the commander's position

Legendary Panzer Aces

Sturmpanzer IV Brummbar

Sturmpanzer IV Brummbär

German Panzer III (Panzerkampfwagen III) Main Battle Tank

German Panzer III (Panzerkampfwagen III)

Tiger P Tank by Ferdinand Porsche vk 45 01 P with 8 8 cm Gun

Tiger P Tank by Ferdinand Porsche: vk 45.01 P

Im Westen, Panzer V (Panther), Image source: Bundesarchiv, Bild 101I-490-3270-06A / Stöpfgeshoff / CC-BY-SA 3.0

The Panzer V Panther Tank

Who Won World War 2 and Who Lost Winners, Losers of WW2, Axis and Allies on map

Who Won World War 2 and Who Lost?

Like us on Facebook!

Blogarama - Blog Directory

Don't Miss